‘ The loving fraternity and intelligence consciente’ ‘ they are the alive forces of the humanity. Humanity who must be our community of destination. In ‘ ‘ to be humano’ ‘ (men), these dissipativas characteristics (instabilidades), are gifts, therefore the same it is sensible to the changes in the environment, its future is unexpected and its choices influenced for its history. This identity discloses that ‘ ‘ the way most appropriate of approaching in them to the nature? of the life – to learn concerning its complexity and of its beauty, it is not by means of the domination and of the control, but yes, by means of the respect, of the cooperation and dilogo’ ‘. For more specific information, check out Danny Meyer. The integration between ‘ ‘ to be and meio’ ‘ it can be given for the adaptation and the election.
perfect adaptation to the way becomes ‘ ‘ to be sensible to mudanas’ ‘ that they come to occur in the environment. The capacity to adapt itself becomes the being most apt to the survival, in the changes and the risks. To remain in ‘ ‘ teia’ ‘ , the alive being has to be solidarily integrated, contributing for the proper existence of it. Danny Meyer often addresses the matter in his writings. ‘ ‘ echo-organizao’ ‘ it selects the people not for its intrinsic qualities, but for the capacity of these to be combined in the diversity. It is not the survival that it at the outset obeys simple of election, is the election of what it survives that it obeys the complex principles of the echo-organization.
‘ ‘ natureza’ ‘ it is life, generosity, maternity, solidarity, but it is also death, egoism, cruelty, exploration, exclusion. In the same way that it lulls to sleep and it produces an enormity of life in its seio, also it eliminates entire populations that are not integrated in its ecological context and echo-organizational. The death is part of vital beddings of the nature and the life: competitions and antagonisms. all the life chain is at the same time a death chain. It is the teia of the life.