The real success of globalization must be determined to the extent that it allows to enjoy each person of the basic goods of food and housing, education and employment, peace and social progress, economic development and justice. Juan Pablo II introduction it says, that there is a world market, a global mass culture, but persist national States, and as they have been weakened enough by neoliberal policies, globalization can be seen as pair threatens its integrity and for his foundation that is culture. For all scholar of administrative science, and that it that you are interested in the repercussions that have derived from globalization, its incidence in some economics, culture, cannot be ignored that globalization has been playing. Hence our interest in delving into its scope, which represents. General, basic considerations cannot be ignored, which represents globalization on the world stage, as well as towards the conquest of new industrialization markets, the placement of all those products and services that guarantee profits and consolidation of large companies, especially in developed countries, in the large economic blocs, all this thanks to the weaknesses of non developed countries, especially those that have been maintained and are still dependent on import of technology, such as the specific case which concerns us from Venezuelathat in the present pay a serious price in this regard, a cost that significantly affects the Venezuelan. We know that it has commented that globalization would basically consist of an expansion of the market to become common space to guide the production, Exchange, distribution and consumption of goods and services between countries and people around the world. The important thing is to evaluate how it has an impact on the culture of each country concerned, as they operate the cultural industries. It is important to emphasize in the analysis, in the Latin American debate (published by the magazine Andrew Bello) has been analyzed this global phenomenon worse two roads: some believe that it is what we are in danger (or rather what will being and producing through cultural industries), in other words, our cultural particularity, before the globalization of certain hegemonic foreign cultural models.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- September 2012
Categories
Meta